|
|
Post by livinganewlife on Dec 17, 2007 11:51:04 GMT -5
And for more on her take of domestic violence, read the January Essence issue. She's intentionally not moving as quickly as Bishop Weeks is with his domestic conference for her own personal reasons. See that's what I'm talking about she says things and uses catchy phrases without taking ownership or being accountable to what has been said..... If you have proclaimed that you are the new face (spokesperson) for Domestic Violence than what's your platform............. what was the motive behind making such statement so quick? BTW: you can't talk about TW without talking about JB because the two became one ;D |
|
|
|
Post by auneeqsol on Dec 17, 2007 11:54:40 GMT -5
A clip of both of them at a conference was posted on you tube, and I know some things can be edited or enhanced but these words came out of her own mouth. First of all no she wasnt convicted of anything, but Juanita is a fighter, in a sense of ,she can get heated up and even yelling and pushing on him is domestic abuse even to the least. And for her to show her bruises , lift her shirt up and all, yes that is consent, and for someone with that kind of clout she has , you know the internet was going to be involved some type of way. But that's just my opinion tho this was interesting in light of this whole matter.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzgF5Ho5a1E |
|
|
|
Post by heaven on Dec 17, 2007 11:55:34 GMT -5
You all this post is about BTWIII, as much as some of you dislike Miss Bynum, let's please give Weeks 100 + pages (focusing on him) as JB has 100 + pages. And for more on her take of domestic violence, read the January Essence issue. She's intentionally not moving as quickly as Bishop Weeks is with his domestic conference for her own personal reasons. Yes, she's taking her time. She's not jumping into it like he did. Her family and friends took those pictures, that's doesn't mean they told her they were going to put the pictures online. They might have wanted everyone to know what he did, but that doesn't mean she did. We don't know if that's true or not. We won't know if that really happened until the trial. |
|
|
|
Post by anointed on Dec 17, 2007 11:56:16 GMT -5
Livinganewlife,
But Juanita Bynum hasn't consented to a tell-all book either (and they're supposed to be one?). That was just low and if Weeks really did write that book, I'm just wondering where would it be located in a bookstore. It sure wouldn't be the Christian inspiration section. And for the record, Juanita has never tried to be the relationship expert like Bishop Weeks. Her participation in those conferences and writing the forward to his book was simply her submitting and supporting her husband in HIS vision. Ya'll said that's what she was supposed to do, right? Submit and Support even if he was teaching a subject that he obviously didn't have enough experience to teach.
|
|
|
|
Post by anointed on Dec 17, 2007 12:02:03 GMT -5
They both had "heated fellowship"  but the greater of the two evils went down in that parking lot. And I'm sorry, I don't think she's lying about it. Otherwise, there would be no need for Weeks to grab for everything in her ministry to distract the parking lot incident ... then again, abuse isn't an incident. And the only instance of abuse that JB mentioned was what TW already admitted to in his conference. You all have said that JB has a tendency to avoid questions asked of her, so just think of all that she could tell concerning TW but choosing to avoid it for the time being. Give the woman a break. She's still coming through the ordeal, and she's supposed to be the domestic violence superwomen next month. Give her time to come up with her plans. Because if you all could really tell the next move of things, you would have seen that Weeks was about to publish a book of their marriage woos (not Bynum as people have thought). I think there was more to why she separated from TW back in June and she's choosing to give "answers" that avoid the real reason for the time being. Now back to Bishop Weeks ... |
|
|
|
Post by heaven on Dec 17, 2007 12:06:28 GMT -5
But Juanita Bynum hasn't consented to a tell-all book either. That was just low and if Weeks really did write that book, I'm just wondering where would it be located in a bookstore. It sure wouldn't be the Christian inspiration section. And for the record, Juanita has never tried to be the relationship expert like Bishop Weeks. Her participation in those conferences and writing the forward to his book was simply her submitting and supporting her husband in HIS vision. Ya'll said that's what she was supposed to do, right? Submit and Support even if he was teaching a subject that he obviously didn't have enough experience to teach. And she never taught anything in the conference. Last year was the first time she did anything in the conference. She gave her opinion on things but she never taught in any service or workshop. People having been posting different things she has said on you tube and taking out of context of what she really was talking about or everything she really said. Trying to make her look bad. I have seen her messages from her woman on the front line conference and I have all of the teach me how to love you conferences except this year because I felt like he should have canceled it because they were separated. How can you help other people with their marital problems if you can't fix your own. |
|
|
|
Post by anointed on Dec 17, 2007 12:14:08 GMT -5
How you doing heaven?  And at their Seeking God for 7 Days conference, BTW was talking about Juanita Bynum in her absence. He said she needs to learn to be more organized. I'm sorry, but why reveal your wife's failure to the church in her absence. That's low. I have most of JB's tapes and not once have I heard her talk about her marriage to BTW negatively. However, at the Teach Me How to Love conferences, Weeks was very open about their marriage (yet he says to have a marriage, you have to have privacy... well, take your own advice Weeks). I feel JB did support him in his VISION to pastor the whole globe (get it ... Global Destiny with churches planted everywhere. However, I'm not knocking his vision (just as he shouldn't knock hers). Weeks also lied and said Bynum hasn't preached in the main services of the church for 15 months. That is a lie. I recall her preaching several times this year on Sundays and Watch Night Service. How do i know? I saw it online live! I still want Weeks to answer this for me : How come during the Seeking God for 7 Days conference, he allowed (as head of the ministry) for a prophetic team to give prophetic impartation to those who registered and left a required fee? Isn't this prophesying for money? I emailed his ministry concerning this and still am awaiting a response. I'm sorry ya'll, but JB was doing well in ministry with her website and all, before she got married. |
|
|
|
Post by livinganewlife on Dec 17, 2007 12:24:00 GMT -5
I'm sorry ya'll, but JB was doing well in ministry with her website and all, before she got married. JB was doing extremely well in ministry before marriage............ but maybe this is what happens when a woman decides to "birth out" a grown man  |
|
|
|
Post by anointed on Dec 17, 2007 12:28:41 GMT -5
I'm sorry ya'll, but JB was doing well in ministry with her website and all, before she got married. JB was doing extremely well in ministry before marriage............ but maybe this is what happens when a woman decides to "birth out" a grown man I know some of you have a problem with her saying "birthing out" but I think it simply means she helps him to accomplish his vision to the end. You know, Paul talk about travailing in birth as well (what! a man giving birth) But we all know the context of what Paul was saying so I think we should be fair to Bynum in her context as well. And you know what, she wasn't about to let this man use her anymore. Even on the radio, Weeks said 2 people were in their wedding who tried to get Bynum to believe he was gay because they wanted her large tithe offering to go to them instead of him (BTW). How sad, to go on radio bringing up the woman's large tithe offering. Now that's what he said. Now I see why she told him (in the first Essence article) has it always been about her money. Yeah, she tried to birth out a man, but a miscarriage happend some where. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by heaven on Dec 17, 2007 12:30:00 GMT -5
Hi anointed.
Yes he is trying everything he can to tear her down. The sunday after the teach me ho to love conf. he was so angry, I had never seen him so angry like that before. Every other sentence out of his mouth had her name in it. He was saying things like she never has to preach at the church again and if she doesn't come back it will be ok. And he was not going to let her or anybody else stop his ministry. He was just saying all kind of things with her name in it.
The last time I remember her preaching was in may because they gave her a mother's day gift.
He even used her name and popularity sometimes to promote his things. He always would always say me and my wife Juanita Bynum. She's the reason he is able to do what he does now. Her name helped him build his ministry to where it is now. Most people did not know his till they got married. Now most people are going to remember him as an abusive husband.
|
|
|
|
Post by anointed on Dec 17, 2007 12:36:10 GMT -5
You know what heaven, I've never known him to host a Teach Me How to Love conference without mentioning her name every other sentence (that's why people are able to say so much about their marriage). This has always been! That's why he was unfavorable as a preacher to me. He talked about "gifts she bought him" and "she said" I was done when he mentioned at the Seeking God for 7 Days conference that Juanita bought him a $7,000 cell phone that he wanted and he only puts certain numbers in it. What does that have to do with Seeking God for 7 Days? But again, it showed how much she loved and put her husband's desire before her own (because she wasn't going to buy it at first ... at least that's what Weeks told the church... in her absence ) Now, I'm about to fry me some chicken. Ya'll want some? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by And Such Were Some Of You on Dec 17, 2007 12:46:44 GMT -5
Are you serious??? If someone said the new face of Covergirl... I wouldn't assume they were saying they started Covergirl... just that this is a person that you may have never seen using this product.... I don't see the phrase as trendy or catchy... it is a commonly used term... I just think we (general) read too much into stuff and think people are trying something new when that is not the case... But then again how can she get on national television and say she is the new face as in "spokesperson" when she has been guilty of being domestically violent to her husband? That's what Im saying its still no humility. And even if the nurse took pics of her bruises..(which thats even hard to believe without consent) she still could have explained it wasnt her intent to have all of the publicity. The nurse didn't take the pics. They were taken before she went to the hospital - I belive the pic was taken via cell phone. |
|
|
|
Post by And Such Were Some Of You on Dec 17, 2007 12:49:01 GMT -5
You all this post is about BTWIII, as much as some of you dislike Miss Bynum, let's please give Weeks 100 + pages (focusing on him) as JB has 100 + pages. And for more on her take of domestic violence, read the January Essence issue. She's intentionally not moving as quickly as Bishop Weeks is with his domestic conference for her own personal reasons. And again, she hasn't called herself innocent or painted Weeks as an abuser. She has said numerous times that she didn't marry a monster nor has he hit her with his fist before. This past case seems to have been the first and she probably is distrustful of him after his snapping. She has said that they're both responsible for the marriage failure. Also she hasn't called herself "the new face of domestic violence" (the media has called her that.) She simply said: "Domestic Violence has a face and a name and it is Juanita Bynum." If women don't like that, they should simply get together and each fill in the blank: "Domestic Violence has a face and a name and it is ___________" Then everyone can be happy! And I don't care whether Bynum was hit more than once or just once, in that instance it becomes Domestic Violence. If Weeks has been abused with bruises, then he should press charges as well. Calm down sis. I don't believe anyone here said that they did not like Juanita Bynum so please be careful with the accusations. |
|
|
|
Post by And Such Were Some Of You on Dec 17, 2007 12:49:48 GMT -5
But then again how can she get on national television and say she is the new face as in "spokesperson" when she has been guilty of being domestically violent to her husband? That's what Im saying its still no humility. And even if the nurse took pics of her bruises..(which thats even hard to believe without consent) she still could have explained it wasnt her intent to have all of the publicity. Miss Kay I love you! You are just too funny. she has not been charged with domestic violence against her husband... that's a huge difference. Also, do you think every picture is taken with consent? Not on anyone's side except the LORD's... I don't have a dog in the fight either way... Oh Lord, I shouldn't have said that... someone is going to accuse of me of siding with Michael Vick! |
|
|
|
Post by And Such Were Some Of You on Dec 17, 2007 12:51:35 GMT -5
And for more on her take of domestic violence, read the January Essence issue. She's intentionally not moving as quickly as Bishop Weeks is with his domestic conference for her own personal reasons. See that's what I'm talking about she says things and uses catchy phrases without taking ownership or being accountable to what has been said..... If you have proclaimed that you are the new face (spokesperson) for Domestic Violence than what's your platform............. what was the motive behind making such statement so quick? BTW: you can't talk about TW without talking about JB because the two became one ;D ROFL, but did they really? |
|
but the greater of the two evils went down in that parking lot. And I'm sorry, I don't think she's lying about it. Otherwise, there would be no need for Weeks to grab for everything in her ministry to distract the parking lot incident ... then again, abuse isn't an incident. And the only instance of abuse that JB mentioned was what TW already admitted to in his conference. You all have said that JB has a tendency to avoid questions asked of her, so just think of all that she could tell concerning TW but choosing to avoid it for the time being. Give the woman a break. She's still coming through the ordeal, and she's supposed to be the domestic violence superwomen next month. Give her time to come up with her plans. Because if you all could really tell the next move of things, you would have seen that Weeks was about to publish a book of their marriage woos (not Bynum as people have thought).
