|
|
Post by anointedteacher on May 14, 2008 20:39:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jasmine on May 14, 2008 22:50:04 GMT -5
she wouldn't have walked out my house in that dress.
|
|
|
|
Post by nina2 on May 14, 2008 22:57:34 GMT -5
OK.... I was going to pass on that one, but I come back because, honestly, now that I "saw" I am actually kind of laughing, because:
1- Gown? What gown? ;D
2- I don't think it was right for her to be arrested. However, I can't put the blame on the people who tried to stop her, even though she apparently offered to cover up more. And what might that have been?? Adding a scarf?
3- I understand that some are going to be more "original" than others, including in the way they dress. But, when they start wearing less to "go out" than they do when they stay in, there might be something drastically wrong...
Finally, I am sure that there is a lawyer somewhere who can take the case and make hay from it.
|
|
|
|
Post by anointedteacher on May 15, 2008 1:52:32 GMT -5
No underwears under the dress!!! They should have arrested her parent
|
|
|
|
Post by livinganewlife on May 15, 2008 6:33:31 GMT -5
No underwears under the dress!!! They should have arrested her parent AT that's what I said when I first saw this story on the news.....I kept wondering why is the news reporter interviewing a teen age child without her parents by her side.... The child was just walking down the street with no under wear on being interviewed...... This is just sad.... |
|
