|
|
Post by Nikkol on Jun 20, 2008 13:31:28 GMT -5
I wanted to throw this question out to you to see what your views are.
A while ago, there were rules/regulations by which the genders were to do. Women were known to cry/be emotional and men even if they would cry wouldn't do it in public. Seeing women hold hands or give a "two arm hug" for a while would be seen as fine while a man doing that same thing would be seen as "questionable", to say the least. Even certain clothing wouldn't be seen on ppl. (those "low rise" skinny leg jeans). Even certain colors would only be seen by certain genders...(like guys wearing pink).
So as times "change", how do you decide what is considered what? Is it blurred?
|
|
|
|
Post by true on Jun 20, 2008 14:34:51 GMT -5
I HATE it when I see men in red pants lol .
I am all for freedom of expression, but the buck stops at men wearing red pants.
I am also not fond of sagging pants showing your underwear , very long dress size T shirts either. For the most part I have no problem with the way folks dress. To each his own.
My model is " you do you , and let me do me".
|
|
|
|
Post by true on Jun 20, 2008 14:36:30 GMT -5
For the record the two armed hug is questionable no matter if it's men or women nowadays  |
|
|
|
Post by Jasmine on Jun 20, 2008 14:56:56 GMT -5
I HATE it when I see men in red pants lol . I am all for freedom of expression, but the buck stops at men wearing red pants. I am also not fond of sagging pants showing your underwear , very long dress size T shirts either. For the most part I have no problem with the way folks dress. To each his own. My model is " you do you , and let me do me". ROFL wow I have not seen a man in red pants, for quite a while now. Do they still make red pants for men? |
|
|
|
Post by And Such Were Some Of You on Jun 21, 2008 6:52:34 GMT -5
I HATE it when I see men in red pants lol . I am all for freedom of expression, but the buck stops at men wearing red pants. I am also not fond of sagging pants showing your underwear , very long dress size T shirts either. For the most part I have no problem with the way folks dress. To each his own. My model is " you do you , and let me do me". ROFL wow I have not seen a man in red pants, for quite a while now. Do they still make red pants for men? Yeah, and I think this guy at my church purchased them all!!! |
|
|
|
Post by vindicated on Jun 23, 2008 12:03:40 GMT -5
does a man with both ears pierced count as gender blurring? cause that is sexy to me!
|
|
|
|
Post by true on Jun 23, 2008 13:35:09 GMT -5
Ahhhhhh Haaaaaa Vin But I hear ya  |
|
|
|
Post by true on Jun 23, 2008 13:36:08 GMT -5
ROFL wow I have not seen a man in red pants, for quite a while now. Do they still make red pants for men? Yeah, and I think this guy at my church purchased them all!!! Bwaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaa |
|
|
|
Post by krazeeboi on Jun 25, 2008 23:36:56 GMT -5
For the record the two armed hug is questionable no matter if it's men or women nowadays That's interesting. I guess you'd think I was "questionable" then. |
|
|
|
Post by Jasmine on Jun 26, 2008 0:04:58 GMT -5
For the record the two armed hug is questionable no matter if it's men or women nowadays That's interesting. I guess you'd think I was "questionable" then. I think its the posturing of the arm hugs more than anything. I get two-armed hugs all the time. I watch my stance, because I don't want anyone to be accused of being "hugged" up with sis jasmine, or vice versa. With all hugs, I just make sure there is distance between the person im hugging. With males, I always hug from a side angle, and I never wrap my arms around anybody. |
|
|
|
Post by krazeeboi on Jun 26, 2008 19:49:30 GMT -5
^Oh Sis. Jasmine, I'm very well aware of the "church sister" hug. But I was referencing the fact that I do hug some of the brothers at church with both arms.
|
|
|
|
Post by true on Jun 26, 2008 20:55:48 GMT -5
For the record the two armed hug is questionable no matter if it's men or women nowadays That's interesting. I guess you'd think I was "questionable" then. Me personally no, that's why I put the sad face there. Some others yes because nowadays folks are looking for reasons to call someone gay. If I listened and believed all the folks that has been called gay are gay then my God the whole world is gay lol |
|
